Social Representations and Social Identity 3 Groups and Social Representations

Doise (in press) has emphasised that researchers have focused empirical work on only one aspect of the theory of social representations. They have mainly been concerned either with describing the content of existing representations or they have been interested in examining how anchoring and objectification operate. They have left largely unexplored Moscovici’s hypotheses concerning the ways in which, at the level of the metasystem, social groups generate representations which serve group purposes. Representations serve different types of group interest and Moscovici describes three: diffusion, propagation and propaganda. Representations serving these three communicative purposes have different structures and organisation. They differ particularly in the extent to which they are consensually shared within a group or a subgroup. The defining property of a social representation is not simply that it should be shared. The predicted internal structure of the representation and the extent to which it is dispersed within a recognisable group or social category will depend upon the functions it is serving. This has major implications for the empirical approaches which should be adopted when exploring social representations.